An anonymous Democratic strategist made a candid admission in a July 14 article in The Hill titled “Democrats find reasons for hope and fear six months into Trump 2.0.” “We better pray long and hard that the country is going to be in a f‑‑‑ing depression,” the strategist said, “because I don’t know how else we find ourselves out of this mess.”
This statement reveals a disturbing political mindset that seems to prioritize electoral survival above the well-being of the American people.
While this strategist seems to endorse a desire for economic suffering to ease Democrats’ own political misfortunes, another Democratic adviser, Rodell Mollineau, lamented the party’s messaging woes: “It’s hard to message when you’re in the wilderness, which is what we are right now. When voters don’t think that you care about their issues, and they don’t think that you’re going to fight for them, that becomes a problem.”
The first quote explains the second. If the desire for nationwide financial collapse to regain power is widespread within the Democratic Party, then Democrats don’t care about voters’ issues, and they just told them so.
Political opportunism is nothing new, and unexpected tragedy tends to bring out the worst elements of our political system. When Hurricane Gustav devastated parts of Louisiana in the heat of the Obama-McCain race in 2008, a video surfaced showing former Democratic National Committee Chair Don Fowler smiling broadly and laughing to Rep. John Spratt (D-S.C.) that the timing would interfere with the Republican National Convention, stating, “God is on our side.” While Fowler later apologized, the optics were damning; Democrats seemingly celebrating suffering because it might affect votes. It was a blunt reminder of how some see human tragedy less as a moment for empathy and more as a political opportunity.
Similarly, when the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010, causing one of the worst environmental disasters in U.S. history, certain right-wing figures used the crisis as a launching pad to attack environmental regulations and portray the Obama administration as incompetent. Media reports and political operatives seized on Obama’s response, emphasizing his weakness and turning the environmental disaster into a potent political weapon.
It’s bad enough when our political leaders celebrate an unexpected disaster for political gain — it’s far worse when they hope for one to happen.
Comments like the ones highlighted above only deepen the widespread distrust voters already have toward the Democratic Party. Democratic approval ratings are hovering near historic lows. When strategists publicly express a willingness or even a desire to endure economic hardship just to regain power, it reinforces the perception that Democrats are disconnected from the everyday struggles of Americans they claim to represent.
This is especially damaging at a time when Democrats are actively trying to rebrand themselves. Figures like David Hogg and Zohran Mamdani represent a younger, more progressive wing attempting to energize the base and reshape the party’s image. Their ideas are unlikely to resonate with what remains of the moderate wing of the Democratic Party or centrist independents, allowing at least some opportunity for more mainstream Democrats to reestablish control of the party’s platform. But comments such as these undercut those efforts, feeding narratives that Democrats of any stripe are out of touch, opportunistic or even indifferent to the well-being of ordinary citizens.
Democratic strategists often express bafflement that President Trump — whom they view as lacking ethics and moral character — could maintain a loyal voter base and win elections. Yet they seem oblivious to the notion that many voters perceive Democrats as equally untrustworthy or self-serving. In a political landscape rife with cynicism, if the Oval Office is going to be occupied by someone viewed as an “immoral scoundrel” regardless of party, some voters conclude they might as well choose the scoundrel promising lower taxes and stronger border security.
To be sure, if pressed, Democratic thought leaders would likely insist the statement was taken out of context or was merely an offhand remark born of frustration — one that does not represent the party’s core values or opinions. And that may even be true. But for a party already in chaos, it is the last thing they need.
Some Republicans suggest there’s no need to launch an aggressive assault on Democrats, since they are doing a perfectly effective job of shooting themselves in the foot. Statements like these only serve to prove those Republicans correct.
Scott C. Mallett is a writer and analyst specializing in political and cultural commentary. A former college instructor, he publishes regularly on Substack, where he explores current affairs through a data-informed lens.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.
