College sports had been circling the drain of legal ambiguity for years, and the White House wanted a win. When President Donald Trump’s executive order landed, it was framed like a rescue mission. “President Trump saves college sports!” The headlines sounded like the system had been fixed overnight. But once people started reading, it was clear the fix wasn’t all that, well… fixed.
The order takes aim at the NIL chaos, booster influence, and dwindling support for non-revenue sports. But despite the dramatic tone, it leaves behind more questions than instructions.
What the Order Says (and Doesn’t Say)
Image via Unsplash/Europeana
At its core, the executive order tries to give shape to a college sports system that’s been drifting. It calls for protecting Olympic and women’s sports, discouraging third-party “pay-for-play” deals, and asking high-revenue programs to do more for non-revenue athletes.
Programs bringing in more than $125 million are told to increase scholarships. Programs over $50 million are expected to maintain current spending and avoid any increases. Smaller schools are warned not to start cutting down their programs or services.
Having said that, the language sticks to “should” rather than “must,” which makes it more of a polite ask than a binding order. Agencies like the Department of Education, Labor, and the Federal Trade Commission have been given 30 to 60 days to figure out the details. Until then, there’s no clear way to know what enforcement might look like, if it happens at all.
The order’s tone echoes what college sports leaders have been asking for. It gives the NCAA a nod, supports keeping athletes out of employee status, and tries to reclaim some control for schools and conferences. But the power to make permanent changes doesn’t live in an executive order. It lives in Congress. And so far, Congress hasn’t given anything solid.
Why Now?
The NCAA has been battered by lawsuits for over a decade. Supreme Court decisions, class actions, and state-level NIL laws have left it with fewer tools to manage the system. The House v. NCAA case, settled for $2.8 billion, added more pressure. Schools will start paying athletes directly soon, and that shift alone has scrambled how colleges think about amateur sports.
In addition, the transfer portal is free for all, endorsement deals have loose oversight, and growing booster collectives. Frankly speaking, the NCAA’s old structure is not built for what college sports have become. Trump’s order dropped into an already unstable landscape.
According to the text, the order came in response to a “chaotic environment” that’s hurting competition and draining money away from non-revenue sports. It blames a mismatch of state laws and booster activity for feeding inequality between rich and less-rich programs.
It also raises alarms about Olympic development, noting that most athletes on the 2024 U.S. Olympic team came through the college system.
What It Means for Athletes
Image via Unsplash/Lesli Whitecotton
There will be no immediate impact on current athletes. Scholarships will not suddenly appear, endorsement deals will not disappear, and booster collectives will not shut down. Schools can still offer NIL opportunities at fair market value. The order only discourages direct payments used as recruitment tools, a line that has been blurred for years.
Some critics say the order favors institutions over individuals. It keeps in place employee status, discourages collective bargaining, and centers control with the schools and conferences. For athletes who’ve been pushing for more rights and better pay structures, this isn’t exactly a breakthrough moment.
Still, the executive order does call for protecting scholarships and women’s sports, which matters to non-revenue athletes who often get overlooked in these debates. The challenge is that protecting something in theory doesn’t always turn into funding it in practice. And the track record of schools cutting smaller programs to shift money toward football and basketball hasn’t gone unnoticed.
Where Congress Fits In
As stated earlier, Congress has the real authority to change how college sports work. The executive order can set a direction, but only lawmakers can deliver the tools needed to enforce it. That includes shielding the NCAA from antitrust lawsuits, creating a uniform national NIL standard, or defining the employment status of athletes across all 50 states.
The SCORE Act, a Republican-led bill, is currently the frontrunner in Congress. It aligns closely with Trump’s order to protect institutions and stop state laws from overriding national rules. The bill has passed two House committees and could go to the floor after the summer recess.
But the Senate is a tougher arena. Democrats aren’t sold on protecting the NCAA without stronger guarantees for student-athletes. They want more clarity around rights, labor protections, and equitable compensation. The gap between the two sides isn’t small, and with election season looming, compromise may take a backseat to messaging.
For now, the NCAA remains in place, but its grip on the system keeps slipping. Power has shifted toward the big-money conferences and the College Sports Commission. As more schools break away from standard rules and settle their own deals, national consistency gets harder to enforce.
The NCAA pushed for federal legislation for years, but it got the executive order instead. While the organization publicly welcomed Trump’s move, leadership also admitted that a new administration could wipe it out in one afternoon.
Final Word
Image via Unsplash/Darren Halstead
Trump’s executive order tries to halt a college sports system that’s been changing faster than anyone planned. It reads like a message to boosters, lawmakers, and athletic directors, and urges them to stabilize before something breaks. But without a law behind it, the order doesn’t have teeth.
For now, the order gives the White House a chance to say it acted. It puts pressure back on lawmakers and gives schools something to point to while they wait. But it won’t stop the recruiting wars, fix the NIL mess, or settle who gets to define what a college athlete is. That’s still up in the air, and time’s running out to land it clean.
