A family whose home was mistakenly raided in the middle of the night by the FBI eight years ago will be permitted to continue their damages lawsuit after the Supreme Court on Thursday sent their case back to a federal appeals court for additional review.
The outcome represents a technical win for the family, which had been barred by lower courts from suing the government over the incident.
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion for a unanimous court.
Curtrina Martin, her partner and her then-7-year-old son were startled awake in 2017 when a six-agent SWAT team – believing that they were targeting the home of a gang member – smashed her front door with a battering ram, detonated a flash-bang grenade and rushed into their suburban Atlanta home.
At some point after Martin was dragged from the closet where she was hiding and held at gunpoint, agents realized they had the wrong house.
The federal government is generally immune from lawsuits, but Congress carved out an exception for some situations involving negligent or wrongful acts of government employees. That law was amended in 1974, following a series of other high-profile raids at the wrong house, to expand the ability of Americans to sue federal law enforcement agents.
But the Atlanta-based 11th US Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the government, holding that the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause barred tort claims against the federal government in circumstances where an official’s actions had “some nexus with furthering a federal policy” and could “reasonably be characterized” as within the range of federal law.
The Institute for Justice, a libertarian public interest law group that represented the Martin family, argued that outcome would completely undermine the intent of Congress. Lawmakers strengthened the Federal Tort Claims Act following a pair of high-profile wrong-house raids in Collinsville, Illinois, in the early 1970s.
During arguments before the Supreme Court in April, the FBI’s handling of the Martin raid drew particular scorn from Justice Gorsuch, a conservative and sometimes-skeptic of federal government power.
“You might look at the address of the house before you knock down the door,” an incredulous Gorsuch pressed the lawyer representing the Justice Department. “How about making sure you’re on the right street? I mean, just the right street? Checking the street sign? Is that, you know, asking too much?”
The Justice Department argued in part that it should not be liable because federal law bars tort suits when a federal employee is exercising discretion in carrying out their work. In this case, the government argued, the agents had to exercise discretion in how they confirmed they were at the correct house.
This story is breaking and has been updated with additional details.
For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com
