onlyTrustedInfo.comonlyTrustedInfo.comonlyTrustedInfo.com
Notification
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Finance
  • Sports
  • Life
  • Entertainment
  • Tech
Reading: Supreme Court allows Trump to proceed with firing plans, federal government reorg
Share
onlyTrustedInfo.comonlyTrustedInfo.com
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Finance
  • Sports
  • Life
  • Entertainment
  • Tech
Search
  • News
  • Finance
  • Sports
  • Life
  • Entertainment
  • Tech
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2025 OnlyTrustedInfo.com . All Rights Reserved.
News

Supreme Court allows Trump to proceed with firing plans, federal government reorg

Last updated: July 8, 2025 4:35 pm
Oliver James
Share
2 Min Read
Supreme Court allows Trump to proceed with firing plans, federal government reorg
SHARE

The Supreme Court is allowing President Donald Trump to move forward with an executive order mandating a restructure of federal agencies and mass layoffs of federal workers.

In a two paragraph unsigned order, the court explained that it was lifting a preliminary injunction issued by a district court in California because “the government is likely to succeed on its argument that the Executive Order and [OMB] memorandum are lawful.”

MORE: Supreme Court’s expansive view of presidential power is ‘solidly’ pro-Trump: ANALYSIS

The court noted, however, that the justices “express no view on the legality of any Agency RIF [reduction in force] and Reorganization Plan produces or approved” by the administration under Trump’s direction. “Those plans are not before this Court,” it said.

The decision, another victory for Trump at the Supreme Court, allows the government to begin taking steps to dramatically overhaul 21 agencies and departments, including the departments of Commerce, Health and Human Services, Energy, Treasury and State.

MORE: Supreme Court lets Trump fire heads of independent labor agencies for now

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a brief statement concurring with the court’s decision, emphasized that the legality of the administration’s plans themselves has not yet been answered.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the sole dissent in the matter. In a 15-page opinion, the junior justice called the decision “not only truly unfortunate but also hubristic and senseless.”

You Might Also Like

Bank of England interest rate decision March 2025

Dan Bongino fumes over Justice Department handling of Epstein files

As legal fight over Guard deployment plays out, Noem vows to continue Trump’s immigration crackdown

Democrat Tina Smith hospitalized amid Senate’s $9 billion spending cut debate

In their words: What judges have said about birthright citizenship and nationwide injunctions

Share This Article
Facebook X Copy Link Print
Share
Previous Article Woman Walks Out of Baby Shower She Hosted After Mom-to-Be Jokes About Her Infertility Woman Walks Out of Baby Shower She Hosted After Mom-to-Be Jokes About Her Infertility
Next Article The Return Of The “Pony”. Mustang Gas-Powered Version Tops Mach-E The Return Of The “Pony”. Mustang Gas-Powered Version Tops Mach-E

Latest News

EY’s London cleaners are picketing its office after over a third were told their jobs could be cut
EY’s London cleaners are picketing its office after over a third were told their jobs could be cut
Finance July 17, 2025
For Sale: Trump is leveraging power of his office to reap profits for family businesses
For Sale: Trump is leveraging power of his office to reap profits for family businesses
Finance July 17, 2025
Boomers Get a Big Beautiful Tax Break: 4 Safe Stocks Yielding 5% to Buy Now
Boomers Get a Big Beautiful Tax Break: 4 Safe Stocks Yielding 5% to Buy Now
Finance July 17, 2025
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader? 7 Things You Definitely Should Know About Tariffs
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader? 7 Things You Definitely Should Know About Tariffs
Finance July 17, 2025
//
  • About Us
  • Contact US
  • Privacy Policy
onlyTrustedInfo.comonlyTrustedInfo.com
© 2025 OnlyTrustedInfo.com . All Rights Reserved.