OpenAI’s Greg Brockman says vibe coding leaves humans with less enjoyable parts of coding.
Vibe coding, popularized by AI tools, is changing the software engineering landscape.
Critics argue that vibe coding may create liability and slow down experienced developers.
An OpenAI cofounder says vibe coding has left human engineers to do quality control.
On an episode of Stripe’s “Cheeky Pint” podcast uploaded last week, OpenAI’s cofounder and president, Greg Brockman, said that AI coding would only get better. But until then, he said, it’s taking away some parts of software engineering that are enjoyable.
“What we’re going to see is AIs taking more and more of the drudgery, more of this like pain, more of the parts that are not very fun for humans,” Brockman said. He added, “So far, the vibe coding has actually taken a lot of code that is actually quite fun.”
He said the state of AI coding had left humans to review and deploy code, which is “not fun at all.”
Brockman added that he was “hopeful” for progress in these other areas, to the point that we end up with a “full AI coworker” that could handle delegated tasks.
Changing engineering landscape
Using AI to write code, dubbed “vibe coding” by the OpenAI cofounder Andrej Karpathy, has skyrocketed this year. Engineers and novices alike are using tools such as Microsoft Copilot, Cursor, and Windsurf to write code, develop games, and even build websites from scratch.
Vibe coding has already started changing how much Big Tech and venture capital value people with software engineering expertise.
In March, Y Combinator CEO Garry Tan said vibe coding was set to transform the startup landscape. He said that what would’ve once taken “50 or 100” engineers to build could now be accomplished by a team of 10, “when they are fully vibe coders.”
Earlier this month, Business Insider reported that AI coding was no longer a nice-to-have skill. Job listings from Visa, Reddit, DoorDash, and a slew of startups showed that the companies explicitly required vibe coding experience or familiarity with AI code generators such as Cursor and Bolt.
Still, some in tech circles say leaning on it heavily is short-sighted, and the job is being trivialized.
Bob McGrew, the former chief research officer at OpenAI, said that while product managers could make “really cool prototypes” with vibe coding, human engineers would still be brought in to “rewrite it from scratch.”
“If you are given a code base that you don’t understand — this is a classic software engineering question — is that a liability or is it an asset? Right? And the classic answer is that it’s a liability,” McGrew said of software made with vibe coding.
GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke said vibe coding might also slow down experienced coders. On a podcast episode released last week, he said a worst-case scenario is when a developer is forced to provide feedback in natural language when they already know how to do it in a programming language.
That would be “basically replacing something that I can do in three seconds with something that might potentially take three minutes or even longer,” Dohmke said.
Read the original article on Business Insider
