The DC terror ambush suspect, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, was once a soldier in Afghanistan’s CIA-backed ‘Zero Units’—forces infamous for their brutal tactics. His journey to the US and subsequent involvement in a suspected terrorist attack raise pressing questions about America’s reliance on foreign proxies and the challenges of security vetting in refugee admissions.
The recent shooting of two National Guard members in Washington, DC, has propelled the story of Rahmanullah Lakanwal—once an Afghan immigrant and now a prime suspect in a terror ambush—into the national spotlight. Beneath the headlines, his history reveals deeper complexities: Lakanwal previously served as a member of the “Zero Units,” elite Afghan counterterror forces created, trained, and supplied by the CIA. The dual legacy of these forces—both praised as anti-terror commandos and accused of brutality—magnifies the stakes of the current investigation.
From Afghanistan’s Front Lines to American Headlines
Rahmanullah Lakanwal, age 29, first joined Afghanistan’s NDS-03 strike force in 2012. The NDS-03 unit is one of several “Zero Units”—Afghan commando groups backed by the CIA and tasked with the most hazardous counterterror work. Lakanwal’s cousin described his rise from humble security guard to team leader and GPS specialist, illustrating how US support, intelligence, and training elevated local fighters into a formidable clandestine force.
These Zero Units played a double role. They served on front lines with CIA officers, performing night raids and secretive missions to disrupt Taliban and al-Qaeda networks. But their reputation was not solely one of heroism. Reports have long indicated they operated with virtual impunity, carrying out covert attacks that blurred the lines between high-value targeting and alleged abuses against civilians.
A Record of Ruthlessness and US Strategy
Human Rights Watch documented pervasive abuses by these CIA-backed units. Their 2019 report attributed to them a pattern of extrajudicial executions, enforced disappearances, and even deadly raids on medical facilities—acts condemned as severe violations of the laws of war, some potentially rising to the level of war crimes. Incidents cited include the assassination of five members of a single family and the fatal shooting of a respected tribal elder. The US government, however, has persistently rejected claims of such brutality from forces under its purview.[Human Rights Watch]
At the war’s end, members of these specialized units were not abandoned. Instead, many—including Lakanwal—were prioritized for emergency evacuation during the 2021 Kabul airlift. Zero Unit fighters helped to secure the perimeter of Kabul’s international airport amid chaos, protecting Americans and other evacuation candidates. Their relocation to the US was held up as an example of loyalty rewarded, yet in some quarters has drawn scrutiny about insufficient vetting and potential trauma among ex-combatants.[New York Post]
The DC Ambush: Immediate and Long-Term Fallout
The recent National Guard shooting in Washington is not only a shocking act of violence but a pivotal moment for US policy. It has triggered nationwide debates over security clearances for refugees, America’s responsibility for its former allies, and the consequences of deploying—and then resettling—traumatized elite fighters in civilian communities. Law enforcement agencies are probing whether the suspect’s background with the CIA-backed unit contributed to mental health challenges or radicalization, while political leaders are reexamining the adequacy of current screening measures.
Broader Context: The Global Risks of Proxy Warfare
This incident sharply focuses attention on a persistent dilemma: The US relies on foreign proxy fighters for vital security missions, but such alliances can yield long-term unpredictability. Those trained to kill on America’s behalf may later find themselves—voluntarily or not—at the epicenter of domestic security threats or public controversies. The Lakanwal case underscores why policymakers must consider not only immediate operational needs, but also enduring social, legal, and psychological impacts when resettling wartime allies.
Key Questions for America Moving Forward
- How thorough are the vetting processes for refugees once embedded with US intelligence?
- To what extent does battlefield trauma or residual loyalty influence subsequent actions in resettled fighters?
- What safeguards exist to monitor or support high-risk arrivals, and are they sufficient?
- How should accountability be assigned for past alliances that may have sown the seeds for current crises?
The Lakanwal case does not offer simple answers. But it forces a public reckoning with the costs, benefits, and hazards of America’s shadow wars—and the lives forever changed, on both sides of the world, as a result.
For world-class, immediate context on unfolding national security stories, continue following onlytrustedinfo.com. Our newsroom moves fast to deliver the most insightful, accurate analysis as the news breaks.
