To determine whether high reps or low reps are better for building a six-pack, it is essential to understand how muscle hypertrophy and endurance work.
Muscle hypertrophy, or muscle growth, occurs through two primary mechanisms: myofibrillar hypertrophy (growth of muscle fibres for strength) and sarcoplasmic hypertrophy (increase in muscle glycogen for endurance) (Schoenfeld, 2010).
Since the rectus abdominis is primarily composed of Type I (slow-twitch) and Type II (fast-twitch) muscle fibres, the training approach should target both for maximum definition and development (Marieb & Hoehn, 2018).
The Role of High Repetition Training
High repetition training is often associated with muscular endurance and is typically performed with lighter loads (60% or less of one-rep max) for 15+ repetitions per set. This type of training primarily targets Type I muscle fibres, which are more fatigue-resistant but generate less power (Baar, 2014).
Benefits of High Rep Ab Training
- Increases muscular endurance: Training with high reps improves the endurance of the abdominal muscles, which is beneficial for prolonged core stability (McGill, 2009).
- Enhances fat oxidation: Studies show that endurance training increases mitochondrial density and improves fat oxidation, which can contribute to lower body fat and more visible abs (Holloszy & Coyle, 1984).
- Minimises recovery time: High rep training induces less central nervous system fatigue and allows for more frequent training sessions (Ratamess et al., 2009).
- Improves core function: Endurance training enhances postural control and overall core engagement, which is crucial for athletes and fitness enthusiasts alike (Hibbs et al., 2008).
The Role of Low Repetition Training
Low repetition training is performed with heavier loads (70-90% of one-rep max) for 1-8 repetitions per set and predominantly targets Type II muscle fibres, which are responsible for strength and power (Folland & Williams, 2007).
Benefits of Low Rep Ab Training
- Increases muscle thickness: Studies show that heavy resistance training leads to myofibrillar hypertrophy, which increases the thickness and density of the abdominal muscles (Schoenfeld, 2010).
- Improves functional strength: Stronger core muscles contribute to better athletic performance, particularly in sports that require explosive movements (Kibler et al., 2006).
- Enhances intra-abdominal pressure: Low-rep, heavy-load training improves the ability of the core to generate stability under high loads, reducing injury risk (Hodges & Richardson, 1996).
- Greater muscle activation: Research using electromyography (EMG) has shown that heavy-loaded core exercises lead to higher activation of abdominal muscles compared to bodyweight exercises (Escamilla et al., 2010).
High Reps vs Low Reps: Which Builds a Six-Pack Faster?
The visibility of the abs is largely dependent on body fat percentage, which is influenced by diet and overall energy expenditure rather than the specific rep range used in training (Miller et al., 2014). However, muscle definition is enhanced by a combination of both high and low rep training.
The Science of Mixed Training Approaches
Research suggests that a periodised approach, which includes both high and low rep ranges, maximises hypertrophy and muscular endurance (Schoenfeld et al., 2016). For example, a study comparing high-rep and low-rep training in resistance-trained individuals found that combining both approaches led to superior muscle growth and endurance than either method alone (Schoenfeld et al., 2015).
The Best Strategy for Six-Pack Development
Combine Strength and Endurance Training
A well-rounded six-pack training programme should incorporate elements of both high-rep endurance training and low-rep strength training. Heavy-loaded core exercises such as weighted cable crunches and hanging leg raises should be complemented with high-rep exercises such as planks and flutter kicks to maximise both muscle growth and endurance.
Prioritise Progressive Overload
Regardless of the rep range, progressive overload is essential. This means gradually increasing resistance, reps, or volume over time to continue stimulating muscle growth (Kraemer & Ratamess, 2004).
Maintain a Low Body Fat Percentage
No amount of abdominal training will produce a visible six-pack if body fat levels are too high. A combination of resistance training, cardiovascular exercise, and a caloric deficit is necessary to reveal abdominal muscles (Trexler et al., 2014).
Conclusion
Both high reps and low reps have benefits for six-pack development. High reps improve endurance and core stability, while low reps build strength and muscle thickness. A combination of both training styles, along with progressive overload and proper nutrition, is the most effective approach for achieving a defined six-pack.
Key Takeaways Table
| Key Takeaways |
|---|
| High-rep training improves muscular endurance and fat oxidation. |
| Low-rep training enhances muscle thickness and functional strength. |
| A combination of high and low reps yields the best results. |
| Progressive overload is crucial for muscle growth. |
| Reducing body fat through diet and cardio is necessary for visible abs. |
References
- Baar, K. (2014). ‘Training for endurance and strength: lessons from cell signaling’, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 46(5), pp. 757-764.
- Escamilla, R. F., McTaggart, M. S., Fricklas, E. J., DeWitt, R., Kelleher, P., Taylor, M. K., & Moorman, C. T. (2010). ‘An electromyographic analysis of core trunk, hip, and thigh muscles during weighted back squats’, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 40(2), pp. 68-76.
- Folland, J. P. & Williams, A. G. (2007). ‘The adaptations to strength training: morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength’, Sports Medicine, 37(2), pp. 145-168.
- Hibbs, A. E., Thompson, K. G., French, D., Wrigley, A., & Spears, I. (2008). ‘Optimizing performance by improving core stability and strength’, Sports Medicine, 38(12), pp. 995-1008.
- Hodges, P. W. & Richardson, C. A. (1996). ‘Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain’, Spine, 21(22), pp. 2640-2650.
- Holloszy, J. O. & Coyle, E. F. (1984). ‘Adaptations of skeletal muscle to endurance exercise and their metabolic consequences’, Journal of Applied Physiology, 56(4), pp. 831-838.
- Kraemer, W. J. & Ratamess, N. A. (2004). ‘Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription’, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 36(4), pp. 674-688.
- Marieb, E. N. & Hoehn, K. (2018). Human Anatomy & Physiology. 11th edn. Pearson.
- McGill, S. M. (2009). Ultimate Back Fitness and Performance. Waterloo, ON: Backfitpro Inc.
- Miller, C. T., Fraser, S. F., Levinger, I., Straznicky, N. E., Dixon, J. B., Reynolds, J., & McAinch, A. J. (2014). ‘The effects of exercise training in overweight individuals on fat metabolism’, Obesity Reviews, 15(3), pp. 234-247.
- Ratamess, N. A. et al. (2009). ‘Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults’, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 41(3), pp. 687-708.
- Schoenfeld, B. J. et al. (2015). ‘Strength and hypertrophy adaptations between low- vs. high-load resistance training’, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29(10), pp. 2954-2963.
