onlyTrustedInfo.comonlyTrustedInfo.comonlyTrustedInfo.com
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Finance
  • Sports
  • Life
  • Entertainment
  • Tech
Reading: Federal judge halts Trump’s order to end collective bargaining rights for many federal workers
Share
onlyTrustedInfo.comonlyTrustedInfo.com
Font ResizerAa
  • News
  • Finance
  • Sports
  • Life
  • Entertainment
  • Tech
Search
  • News
  • Finance
  • Sports
  • Life
  • Entertainment
  • Tech
  • Advertise
  • Advertise
© 2025 OnlyTrustedInfo.com . All Rights Reserved.
News

Federal judge halts Trump’s order to end collective bargaining rights for many federal workers

Last updated: June 25, 2025 12:52 am
OnlyTrustedInfo.com
Share
5 Min Read
Federal judge halts Trump’s order to end collective bargaining rights for many federal workers
SHARE

A federal judge on Tuesday indefinitely blocked President Donald Trump’s effort to terminate the collective bargaining rights for more than a million federal employees.

Judge James Donato of the US District Court in San Francisco granted the preliminary injunction requested by a coalition of unions whose members would be stripped of their collective bargaining rights under Trump’s executive order. However, Donato’s decision clashes with a May ruling by the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, which lifted a different judge’s block on Trump’s order pertaining to another union’s members.

Donato, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, said the unions that brought the case before him had “demonstrated a serious question as to whether their First Amendment rights have been violated.” The judge said he was blocking the executive order pending a trial over the order’s constitutionality.

“Plaintiffs have raised serious questions under the First Amendment that warrant further litigation,” he wrote, adding that the unions have shown they would face “a strong likelihood of irreparable harm from the loss of their collective bargaining and allied rights.”

The Trump administration has the option of appealing Donato’s ruling to the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals.

At issue is Trump’s unprecedented executive order from March that seeks to abolish multiple agencies’ union contracts in the name of national security. It would apply to departments including State, Veterans Affairs and Justice, as well as smaller agencies such as the National Science Foundation and Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The order is aimed at stopping federal unions who have “declared war on President Trump’s agenda,” according to a White House fact sheet. It claimed the American Federation of Government Employees, the largest federal workers’ union, has filed many grievances to “block Trump policies.”

The unions, led by AFGE, argue that Trump’s actions are retaliation and violate the right to engage in constitutionally protected speech. Also, the suit alleges the administration is attempting to apply the national security exemption to eliminate the rights of workers whose primary duties are not related to national security.

Donato said in his 29-page ruling that the White House fact sheet was “solid evidence of a tie between the exercise of First Amendment rights and a government sanction.”

“The Fact Sheet called out federal unions for vocal opposition to President Trump’s agenda. It condemned unions who criticized the President and expressed support only for unions who toed the line. It mandated the dissolution of long-standing collective bargaining rights and other workplace protections for federal unions deemed oppositional to the President,” he wrote.

Also, while Donato wrote he would not second guess the president’s national security determinations, “a claim of national security does not, of course, automatically negate the Constitution, particularly with respect to the First Amendment.”

The ruling by Donato follows a defeat for federal workers in a separate lawsuit filed by the National Treasury Employees Union, which argued that Trump’s directive would strip union rights from about two-thirds of its members and deprive it of critical union dues that are deducted from members’ paychecks.

The 2-1 order from the DC Circuit last month said that the NTEU had not shown that it would be irreparably harmed without a court order blocking the executive order. The panel’s majority — made up of a President George H.W. Bush appointee and a Trump appointee — said the harms alleged by the union were “speculative,” in part, because the Trump administration had directed agencies not to terminate collective bargaining agreements before litigation over the order concluded.

A President Joe Biden appointee who dissented from the appellate decision said that self-imposed restriction showed the Trump administration would not be harmed if the preliminary injunction issued by the district judge was left in place.

CNN’s Tierney Sneed contributed to this report.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com

You Might Also Like

‘We are going to have a system of merit’: Trump White House vows to kill DEI

3 officers injured in shooting at Texas Border Patrol facility; armed man killed

US inflation cools and Americans step up spending as they brace for tariff impact

MTA will reap NYC business tax, speed camera fines under NY’s $254B behemoth budget

Trump to Canadian PM: ‘Never say never’ on Canada becoming 51st state

Share This Article
Facebook X Copy Link Print
Share
Previous Article NFL offseason power rankings: No. 27 New York Giants have a coach and GM on the hottest seat NFL offseason power rankings: No. 27 New York Giants have a coach and GM on the hottest seat
Next Article Honduras, US discuss immigration, security after tense start to relations under Trump administration Honduras, US discuss immigration, security after tense start to relations under Trump administration

Latest News

PFL Brussels 2026: Why the Odds Are Stacked Against the Underdogs in a Night of Dominant Favorites
PFL Brussels 2026: Why the Odds Are Stacked Against the Underdogs in a Night of Dominant Favorites
Sports May 23, 2026
Ja Morant Spotted at WNBA’s Dream vs. Wings: What His Presence Means for the NBA Star and Women’s Basketball
Ja Morant Spotted at WNBA’s Dream vs. Wings: What His Presence Means for the NBA Star and Women’s Basketball
Sports May 23, 2026
WWE Clash in Italy: Rhea Ripley vs. Jade Cargill Rematch Confirmed—Why This Title Showdown Matters
WWE Clash in Italy: Rhea Ripley vs. Jade Cargill Rematch Confirmed—Why This Title Showdown Matters
Sports May 23, 2026
Gerrit Cole’s Triumphant Return: 6 Shutout Innings After 569-Day Absence, But Yankees Fall to Rays
Gerrit Cole’s Triumphant Return: 6 Shutout Innings After 569-Day Absence, But Yankees Fall to Rays
Sports May 23, 2026
//
  • About Us
  • Contact US
  • Privacy Policy
onlyTrustedInfo.comonlyTrustedInfo.com
© 2026 OnlyTrustedInfo.com . All Rights Reserved.