Big 12’s Stance on Field Storming: A Deep Dive into Arizona State and Texas Tech Fines

8 Min Read

The Big 12 Conference continues to take a firm stance against field storming, levying significant $50,000 fines and public reprimands against its member institutions. Recent incidents involving Arizona State and Texas Tech highlight the league’s unwavering commitment to player and official safety, even as passionate fan celebrations mark historic victories. These events spark crucial discussions within the fan community about balancing game-day excitement with necessary security protocols.

The roar of the crowd, the final whistle, and the celebratory surge onto the field – it’s a quintessential scene in college football, especially after a monumental upset or a hard-fought victory. However, this exhilarating tradition comes with a hefty price tag in the Big 12 Conference. Recent penalties against No. 24 Arizona State and a past fine for Texas Tech underscore the league’s rigorous enforcement of its post-game celebration policies, specifically targeting field storming to prioritize player and official safety.

Arizona State’s Thrilling Victory and Immediate Repercussions

On October 18, 2025, euphoria erupted at Mountain America Stadium as No. 24 Arizona State secured a dramatic 26-22 comeback victory over No. 14 Texas Tech. The Sun Devils, having blown a 12-point fourth-quarter lead, rallied behind quarterback Sam Leavitt and a crucial 1-yard touchdown run by Raleek Brown with just 34 seconds left on the clock. The win propelled Arizona State back into the AP Top 25.

However, the celebration was short-lived for the school’s athletic department. The Big 12 Conference wasted no time, fining Arizona State $50,000 and issuing a public reprimand for the field storming incident. Big 12 Commissioner Brett Yormark reiterated the conference’s core principle, stating, “The Big 12 prioritizes the safety of all players, coaches and officials,” as reported by the Associated Press. This swift action highlighted the league’s zero-tolerance policy for compromising safety.

Texas Tech’s Underdog Upset and a Sponsor’s Timely Intervention

The Arizona State fine echoes a similar event from September 24, 2022, when an unranked Texas Tech team, considered massive underdogs, pulled off a stunning 37-34 overtime win against then-No. 22 Texas at Jones AT&T Stadium in Lubbock. The improbable victory sent Red Raider fans streaming onto the field in an outpouring of joy and excitement.

Like Arizona State, Texas Tech was promptly fined $50,000 and publicly reprimanded by the Big 12. Commissioner Yormark emphasized the “duty to provide a safe game environment,” noting that Texas Tech’s event management policy, despite being “well thought out,” failed to ensure the safety of visiting team personnel. This incident gained additional scrutiny after a video surfaced online showing a Tech fan shoving Texas edge Ovie Oghoufo, prompting the university to seek information about the individual. Texas coach Steve Sarkisian acknowledged the excitement but stressed the importance of safety measures for everyone involved, as detailed by ESPN.

In a unique turn of events, City Bank, a longtime corporate partner of Texas Tech athletics, stepped forward to pay the $50,000 fine. Director of Athletics Kirby Hocutt expressed gratitude, acknowledging the passionate fan base and the bank’s support. Cory T. Newsom, City Bank’s president and CEO, articulated their understanding of the excitement a victory over a rival can generate, while also supporting the university’s efforts to ensure a safe game-day environment.

The Big 12’s Unwavering Commitment to Safety

These two incidents highlight a consistent theme from the Big 12 Conference leadership: player, coach, and official safety is paramount. Commissioner Yormark’s statements after both events deliver a clear message:

  • Zero Tolerance: The conference has “zero tolerance for any act that compromises the safety of game participants.”
  • Event Management Responsibility: Home institutions are held accountable for providing “adequate security measures” and ensuring their event management policies are effective.
  • Consistent Penalties: The standard $50,000 fine and public reprimand serve as a deterrent, reflecting the seriousness with which the league views these violations.

This firm stance is not unique to the Big 12, as various college football conferences across the nation have implemented similar rules and penalties to curb the practice of field storming, often driven by increasing concerns over potential injuries to athletes and staff.

Fan Perspective: The Cost of Celebration

For fans, rushing the field after an unexpected or significant win is an unparalleled experience, a visceral connection to the team’s triumph. It’s a spontaneous expression of collective joy that often defies rules in the heat of the moment. The discussions on fan forums and social media often revolve around:

  • The Thrill vs. The Rule: Many fans argue that the excitement of a victory outweighs the potential for a fine, especially when the fine doesn’t directly impact ticket prices or fan experience.
  • Effectiveness of Fines: The debate continues on whether a $50,000 fine truly deters thousands of fans from rushing the field, particularly when a corporate sponsor or fan donations cover the cost, as seen with Texas Tech.
  • Security Measures: Fans and analysts often discuss the practical challenges of preventing field storming, particularly in stadiums not designed with robust physical barriers or immediate security responses.

The incidents involving Arizona State and Texas Tech provide excellent case studies for the ongoing tension between a cherished college football tradition and the modern demands of athlete safety and event management. As conferences like the Big 12 continue to prioritize safety, institutions must innovate in their crowd control and security protocols to ensure that celebrations remain memorable for the right reasons.

Share This Article